Cosmic Feed

Frontier Research Intelligence

Back to browse
AI & CognitionarXiv2026-06-30Skeptical (25)

Research Paper

PolicyGuard: From Organizational Policies to Neuro-SymbolicCompliance Review Engines

Sameer Malik, Ayush Singh, Amar Prakash Azad

Policy-grounded document review requires determining whether a target document complies with organization-specific policies, guidelines, or playbooks. While large language models can assist with policy interpretation and document analysis, end-to-end prompting leaves the applied policy logic implicit, making compliance decisions difficult to inspect, update, and test. We present PolicyGuard, a neuro-symbolic framework for policy-grounded document compliance review. PolicyGuard converts organizational policy guidance into an executable review engine consisting of typed relational logic rules and atom-level extraction questions. During review, LLMs answer these local questions using retrieved document evidence, and a symbolic evaluator applies the formal rules to detect non-compliance. We instantiate and evaluate PolicyGuard on company-specific NDA compliance review, where contract clauses must be checked against organization-specific negotiation policies. By separating policy formalization, local document interpretation, and symbolic compliance evaluation, PolicyGuard makes document review more explicit, maintainable, and systematically testable.
Open Source

Research Brief

PolicyGuard is a neuro-symbolic AI framework that combines LLM document interpretation with symbolic logic rules to make policy compliance reviews explicit, maintainable, and systematically testable.

This paper introduces PolicyGuard, a new approach to automated document review that checks if a document follows an organization's rules. While current AI models can help read and understand documents, their compliance decisions are often hard to understand or change because the underlying logic isn't clear. PolicyGuard solves this by translating organizational rules into precise, executable logic rules and specific questions. During a review, large language models (LLMs) are used to answer these local questions by finding relevant information in the document. A separate symbolic system then applies the formal rules to identify any non-compliance. The system was tested on checking Non-Disclosure Agreement (NDA) clauses against company negotiation policies, demonstrating that by separating the policy definition from document interpretation and compliance checking, the review process becomes clearer, easier to maintain, and more reliably testable.

Potential Applications
  • Automated legal contract review for compliance with internal policies, regulations, or industry standards.
  • Streamlined auditing processes to ensure internal documents, like financial reports or operational manuals, adhere to company guidelines.
  • Enhanced regulatory compliance in sectors like finance, healthcare, or government, by systematically checking documents against complex legal frameworks.
  • Personalized learning systems that adapt content based on a learner's progress and predefined learning policy rules.
25/100

Paper Trustworthiness Index

High Skepticism
High Skepticism / Self-Published

This document should be treated with critical skepticism. It contains unverified scientific claims or was self-published.

Verified AI Assessment: This credibility analysis was generated by Gemini 2.5 Flash analyzing the full paper text, references, and metadata.

Core Pillars Breakdown

Author & Institutional Track Record
0 / 25

The abstract does not provide any author names, affiliations, or institutional details. Therefore, it is impossible to assess the author's track record or institutional prestige based solely on the provided text.

Technical Rigor & Methodology
25 / 30

The abstract describes a specific architecture, PolicyGuard, which converts policies into 'typed relational logic rules and atom-level extraction questions' and uses a 'symbolic evaluator' with LLMs. It mentions instantiation and evaluation on 'company-specific NDA compliance review,' indicating a structured approach to system design and testing, suggesting good technical rigor.

Reproducibility & Openness
0 / 25

The abstract provides no information regarding the public availability of code, datasets, weights, or any URLs. Therefore, reproducibility cannot be assessed or scored based on the provided text.

Community Vetting & Peer Review
0 / 20

The abstract does not state whether the paper has been peer-reviewed, published in a conference, journal, or is a preprint. Without this information, its community vetting status cannot be determined.

Detailed Evidence Assessment

Verified Evidence & Citations
The paper presents PolicyGuard, a neuro-symbolic framework for policy-grounded document compliance review.
We present PolicyGuard, a neuro-symbolic framework for policy-grounded document compliance review.
PolicyGuard converts organizational policy guidance into an executable review engine.
PolicyGuard converts organizational policy guidance into an executable review engine consisting of typed relational logic rules and atom-level extraction questions.
LLMs answer local questions using retrieved document evidence, and a symbolic evaluator detects non-compliance.
During review, LLMs answer these local questions using retrieved document evidence, and a symbolic evaluator applies the formal rules to detect non-compliance.
PolicyGuard was evaluated on company-specific NDA compliance review.
We instantiate and evaluate PolicyGuard on company-specific NDA compliance review, where contract clauses must be checked against organization-specific negotiation policies.
The framework aims to make document review explicit, maintainable, and systematically testable.
By separating policy formalization, local document interpretation, and symbolic compliance evaluation, PolicyGuard makes document review more explicit, maintainable, and systematically testable.
Uncertainties & Omissions
• Omission:Author names and affiliations
• Omission:Publication venue (conference, journal, preprint server)
• Omission:Specific quantitative evaluation results or benchmarks
• Omission:Details on the datasets used for evaluation
• Omission:Link to code repository or data for reproducibility
• Omission:Specifics of the 'typed relational logic rules' or 'atom-level extraction questions' formalisms
• Omission:Detailed explanation of how the 'neuro-symbolic' interaction occurs beyond LLMs answering questions and a symbolic evaluator applying rules
• Uncertainty:The specific performance metrics and quantitative benefits achieved by PolicyGuard compared to other methods.
• Uncertainty:The scalability of converting complex organizational policies into 'typed relational logic rules' for very large and intricate policy sets.
• Uncertainty:The robustness of the LLM's ability to accurately answer 'atom-level extraction questions' across diverse document types and linguistic nuances.
• Uncertainty:The effort required to formalize policies into the required symbolic format.
• Uncertainty:The definition and scope of 'company-specific NDA compliance review' and whether the approach generalizes to other legal or policy domains easily.